Every time I think to myself 'must be a troll, nobody can be this dumb' I have to stop and remind myself just what forum I'm reading.

"Please mister CCP, cover up for my inability to catch ratters."

As you post with your NPC alt.

Who castrated you? Let me guess?
You're alliance kicks when you use local, like the OP?

But then I'm like, ***** called me a tard.

It's obvious you're only seeing one part of a significantly more complex picture. I'm sorry you're incapable of understanding why this is an utterly ******** suggestion, but it is.

No, they get it. They just don't give a ****.
Huge difference.

They don't care that it would make the game boring, they want corps to be forced to put groups of guys on stations 24/ 7 to protect their space.


PS: And they think the largest group of null players would have the hardest time with this. Obviously their ******, disfunctional, unorganized corporations and alliance will manage to be able to keep guys on their gates while they bounce around CFC space.

We'd never be able to send hundreds over to them AND protect our own systems.
Obviously "the blob" will have the hardest time of this, not considerably smaller entitties.

PSS: If you can't already keep us from TAKING your space, how the **** are you going to DEFEND it against us. The stupidity of it.

Incorrect from start to finish. It's just as much of a cockstab to keep industrials and ratters safe in any system, be it "a blob" with a whole region, or a small alliance/corp trying to keep a system safe.

Without of course.

Because without local I'd go do my ratting etc in High Sec and be totally safe.


HTH

And what is your "case"? "How to **** up the game 101"?

The way to get that result is by banning NPC corps, not removing local.

Sure they would.

"Make it less safe" - Banning the safety net of NPC corps (guaranteed CONCORD protection) would make wardecs far more effective and actually start to carry out their intended function (contest resources in highsec).

"More fun" - Facing the above lack of safety would introduce adversity and challenge to many EVE players for the first time (which is what seperates EVE as an MMO from some sort of multiplayer 'free time to virtual space rock conversion simulator') not to mention more fun for those doing the attacking.

"Harsh to live in" - NPC corps with their guaranteed CONCORD protections against any and all forms of PVP is the opposite of "harsh". Obviously, banning NPC corps would go a great distance towards this goal (while making it more fun).

"Promoting teamwork" - NPC corps actively incentivize against teamwork, banning them would correct this as well.

Carebearing in low/null is safe?

When did IRC become a part of the CFC? To be fair I can see how I my quips could've been lost in this sea of Gewns, but I'm sure you would've ignored me anyway to help maintain your narrative.

So what's changed to enable me to park a hulk in a belt and go AFK for a few hours?

Uh, carebearing in low is actually absurdly unsafe, especially compared to the rewards you get. And while carebearing in null in a large sov alliance, and only in that situation, might be pretty safe day to day, it's still fairly unsafe overall.

I am not, but I can ask what's changed to allow me to put f.ex a permarep dominix on a gate or in an anom and go afk for hours without coming back to an alphaclone in a station, if that helps you think of something other than hisec.

npc corp poster lecturing about the safety of other regions lol

almost as funny when a wormhole guy does it.

U missed there main argument they said all along kit would make it so danger filled no one would live in null. Witch I call bullshit on.

But then they say it makes it to safe.

Nothing, because I'm AFK.

npc corp poster with zero kills has spoken

You might want to grasp harder at them straws. I don't bot, but feel free to tell sreegs I am, I'm sure it'll end well for you.


What? Is it an impossibility to go AFK to make dinner while in nullsec? I mean, it's so safe and all.

So what you're saying is, if I'm not paying attention at all times, nullsec is unsafe?

But you promised it was completely safe.

Hm okay, being caught lying = winning arguments now.


I'm quite certain any member of INK would react the same to an NPC corp poster lying through their teeth about their in-game experience and claiming that lowsec mining was more rewarding and safer then hiding in an NPC corp. Well, I might be putting my thoughts more civil then most.

The fact you have no experience with the game features and gameplay you're criticizing certainly makes your arguments less valid. Also,

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2094720#post2094720



2 pages and no reply from you, I'd say your argument was handled a long time ago.

Sure, while you post on a 4 month old NPC alt about the years of PvEing in null sec.

I'm sure you're very trustworthy.

Tantamount to talking a bunch of **** to your overly large, musclebound, neighbor and then running inside and calling the cops when he comes over to teach you about manners.